1. According to the articles, digital art should not be called art because according to the artists, AI does the work for us and also takes away the main idea of the process of creating a work from scratch, but they forget about the process that despite the fact that it advances much faster is expensive, so in my opinion digital art should be considered art only if the original ideas are created by the artist and not only does it with AI but also that the design carries an editing process of the artist, as well as Jason Allen since this way he showed his main idea of what he wanted to express through his art to people and let them know the process that he carried out, also although it seems easy to use artificial intelligence to create art, we do not know the work that it can generate.

2. I think that the concern of artists is not exaggerated but it has neutral ideas because in a certain way unlike the camera which is now a tool, AI has many more uses so it not only speaks of a painting and sculpture, but also that artists thanks to AI have enough capacity to skip processes, since AI can illustrate and the artist only modifies it and that is why many illustrator artists tend to be afraid that AI will take their place and thus lower the demand in this branch of study, on the other hand we do not know how much it costs to edit the illustration to the point that the artist shows what he thought with AI and the fact that he is seeing details and using tools that many of the times we do not know is complicated and we know how much it cost artists to learn how to use them correctly.